Esoteric Coffeehouse

As with many legends, the recorded history of the Knights Templar is probably less spectacular than people’s imagination. The Templar order was one of the several military monk institutions established in the High Middle Ages, amongst which the other prominent ones were the Knights Hospitaller and the Teutonic Knights. Yet it was only the Templars that captured the imagination of the West as an archetype of the secret society.

The Knights Templar were established around 1119 by Hugh de Paynes (Payns), a French knight who had participated in the First Crusade and helped in the capture of Jerusalem from the Moslems (1). To quickly recap, the First Crusade (1095-1099) was the most successful of all, as mostly French (or Franks as they were called then) knights had conquered Jerusalem, as well as several important cities in the Middle East, such as Antioch and Tripoli. Following the conquest, the Crusaders established a system of feudal states in the region, out of which the Kingdom of Jerusalem was the most important. The Crusader success created a new pilgrimage fervor in the West, with thousands of pilgrims taking the inland route through Byzantium to reach the Holy Land. When they did so, they often found themselves robbed or killed by bands of Turks and other raiders (2). It was this situation that prompted Hugh de Paynes, with eight other knights, to propose the establishment of a monk order that would actually protect the pilgrims and locals from Moslem raids. The King of Jerusalem, Baldwin II, was happy to grant this new order and actually gave them headquarters on the Holy Mount, in the captured Al-Aqsa mosque (3).

But why a monk order, and not a regular army corps? The answer is not very straightforward. It is said that Paynes was inspired by the Hospitallers, a monk order that had set up a Hospital in Jerusalem to feed and treat poor pilgrims. Yet at this stage the Hospitallers apparently were not a military order (4). The Templars were also influenced by the Cistercian movement in southern France, which was a supranational monk order which contributed to the flourishing of learning in the High Middle Ages (5). Yet, again, as all monk orders of Europe, the Cistercians were not a fighting order. An early analysis proposed that the model of the Templars might not have come from Christianity at all, but from a mysterious warlike group of Moslems called the Assassins (6). The Assassins were an Islamic warrior sect that belonged to a particular Shi’ite branch, called the Ismailis (the Moslem community had suffered a schism in the early 800s into the majoritary Sunnite and the minority Shiite). This connection is hard to establish, as the Templars and the Assassins were in opposite camps. It is perhaps safer to conclude that the Templar order, just as the Hospitaller and Teutonic knights, were products of their own age, which sought to achieve divine salvation through holy conquest. The First Crusade was led under this premise, and the Templars only continued its ethos.

(more…)

Everyone remembers the witch hunts of the 1500 and 1600s as an ugly chapter of Western history. Thousands of so-called witches were burned, drowned, or tortured in an attempt to get rid of what the Inquisitors called ‘devil worship’. Today, we rarely believe that the witches were in league with the devil. In fact, during the early 20th century, scholars thought that witchcraft itself was a complete invention of the witch hunters (1). Even when some reality to the phenomenon was admitted, witch beliefs were dismissed as the matter of ‘female hysteria’ or peasant superstition (2).

Beginning with the 1960s and 70s, scholars began to consider witchcraft as more than a fiction of the Inquisition, and concentrated on analyzing its meaning for the peasant society (3), (4). Yet even this attempt was marred by a tendency of dismissing witchcraft as pure imagination.

If most scholarship believed witchcraft had no reality to it, there was one early dissenting voice: Margaret Murray, who maintained in 1926 that witchcraft was real, and that it actually represented a European-wide pagan religion dedicated to a horned god identifiable as Janus or Cernunnos (5). The medieval civilization was thus divided into the true Christians and the pagan “secret society” that adopted Christianity only as a facade. In an era of rationalism, numerous scholars rejected Murray’s work as pure fantasy (6).

Murray may have used her imagination to embellish the facts, but this does not necessarily mean that the whole phenomenon of witchcraft was imaginary. However, it was not until Carlo Ginzburg’s landmark studies that scholars began to really consider this possibility.

(more…)

Back in the late 1700s, a Freemason by the name of Court de Gebelin was shown for the first time a tarot pack. He studied the cards and a revelation hit him: they were living remnants of ancient Egyptian religion. He was so convinced of his intuition that he wrote an entire treatise on the Tarot and its Egyptian origins (1). He did not offer much in terms of evidence to uphold his conviction, but we must keep in mind that he was writing at a time when the so-called ‘scientific method’ was not part of the humanistic tradition. A friend of his, the Count of Mellet, wrote a supporting essay that went even further by claiming that Tarot was the surviving “book of Thoth” that contained divine Egyptian revelations (2). Gebelin and Mellet’s work gave birth to an entire esoteric tradition that maintained the Egyptian origin of the play pack. Following this tradition, a French cartomancer named Eteilla became famous by expanding on the Egyptian Tarot, and later in the 19th century, the physician Papus affirmed that the Tarot was the “Bible of Bibles”, the book of Hermes Trismegistus, kept alive by the Gypsies (3). It was only at the beginning of the 20th century, in the authoritative work of A.E.Waite, Pictorial Key to the Tarot, that he remonstrated those that believed that the pack could have possibly originated from Egypt (4). However, remnants of the old esoteric belief can still be found in Aleister Crowley’s Book of Thoth tarot pack and modern tarot creations like the Ancient Egyptian Tarot (5, 6).

Waite’s deconstructionism was based on a rising modern concern with recorded history. In this sense, he was correct: apparently, the first tarot packs in a recognizable form rose in Italy in the 1400s, before spreading far and wide across Europe (7). In the 1600 and 1700s the tarot game was at its peak, being played in many intellectual salons throughout the continent (8). There is little evidence that any mystical or esoteric meaning was associated to the Tarot prior to Gebelin’s revelation: apparently it was only in the early 1700s that symbolism began to be associated with it (9). What is certain is that, after Gebelin and Mallet’s “manifestos”, Tarot became less and less of a game and more and more of an instrument of divination, meditation or esoteric philosophy, as it remains until today. You can hardly hear of anyone actually playing the Tarot, even though except for the 22 trumps, the others are very similar to the normal playing cards.

(more…)

Like all things of Hermetic extract, alchemy hails from Egypt, and its recorded origins can be traced back to the late antique world. The etymology of the name ‘alchemy’ is not clear – it may have referred to Egypt as the “black land” (chemia) or perhaps to the first stage of the alchemical work, nigredo (blackness) (1, 2). The beginnings of alchemy are shrouded in mystery, but it is known that, by 300-400 AD, Greek alchemists such as Pseudo-Democritus, Zosimos and Synesius were writing about the process of gold-making in mystical, obscure terms.

Alchemy has survived throughout the centuries based on a few fundamental concepts, which I have summarized as:

1. the tradition that viewed gold as the highest, and purest of metals.

2. the belief that matter was not inert, but continuously transformed itself into something ‘higher’. Thus all metals would eventually become gold, given enough time.

3. human beings could hasten the work of nature, transforming metals into gold by means of an intermediary substance called the Philosopher’s Stone. This Stone was seen as not only bettering metals but human beings as well, lengthening life and curing illnesses (3).

4. the process of going to the heart of matter and enacting its change was seen as something sacred or even mystical; thus there was a fundamental participation of the alchemist in the work resulting in an inner change as well as an outer one.

(more…)

As with all major discoveries, serendipity was at play when legendary Ethiopian goat herder Kaldi first noticed the strange properties of the coffee berry. Myth has it that he observed his goats behaving strangely upon consumption of the mysterious berries: they began “dancing” around excitedly. An enterprising – and courageous – gentleman, Kaldi took it upon himself to try out the berries. As chance would have it, he did not die, but in fact became a happier man (and apparently made his wife a happier woman too!).

One cannot help to identify in this short story the hints of ancient beliefs. In fact, the story has a flavour of forgotten mystery rituals, recalling the Greek legends of Dionysus the discoverer of wine or the goat-like Pan with his invention of the reed flute.  In the absence of evidence, one can speculate  on the association with ‘goats’, frenzy, wild dances and ‘wife-pleasing’ in the little Kaldi story. The suggestion may be of an earth mystery that could easily be associated with devil worship, which in fact it was.

Another beautifully ambiguous tidbit of the Kaldi story has the goat herder, impelled by his happy wife, presenting himself with the berries to the local monk of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church. The monk promptly attributed the berries to the work of the devil, but in a twist, the other monks were delighted with the smell and tried it themselves¹. In this tale, the ambivalent religious use of coffee was first prefigured.

(more…)