The Hermetic Writings: Survival of Ancient Egyptian Beliefs
During the Renaissance, scholars were convinced that the surviving Hermetic fragments – notably the Corpus Hermeticum and the Emerald Tablet – originated in ancient
However, in
Casaubon’s deconstructive analysis may have dealt a deadly blow to the Renaissance belief in the antiquity of Hermetic writings, but it did not stop esoteric groups and thinkers from regarding them highly. Nevertheless, academic scholars avoided the analysis of the Corpus Hermeticum until the middle of the 20th century.
The first author to dabble into the Hermetic writings was, ironically, another French classical scholar – A.J. Festugiere, who wrote an impressive four-volume work only to re-affirm the purely Greek origins of the Corpus(1). He believed that the Hermetic fragments were commonplace Greek speculation that had no real value except as reiteration of late antique beliefs. Nevertheless, the pioneering work of Festugiere should not be discounted lightly, as it offers a wealth of information on the world of late antiquity and the intertwining of Hermeticism with other currents like Neoplatonism, Gnosticism or Stoicism. Moreover, Festugiere’s work may have helped a revival in Hermetic studies. Yet a new impetus was given after the World War II, particularly due to the discovery of additional Hermetic fragments in the Gnostic Library of Nag Hammadi, and also thanks to the seminal work of Frances Yates, Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition, which sparked a new scholarly interest in Hermetic writings (2). It is a new generation of Hermetic scholars, notably J.P. Mahe, G. Fowden and P. Kingsley that are changing the ways we perceive the Corpus Hermeticum (3).
What have they discovered?
It now appears that while the Corpus Hermeticum may have been written down in late antiquity, its roots do trace back into Pharaonic
The Hermetic fragments, as they now stand, can be divided into three types:
- Metaphysical – concerning the nature of the divine, the universe, and man;
- Mystical / initiatory – concerning the ability of man to accede into the divine realm and be transformed;
- Magical – including magical recipes and incantations.
Most early scholars, such as Festugiere, thought to clearly differentiate between the ‘lower’ (magical) Hermetica and the higher (philosophical) Hermetica, which were supposed to be unrelated. It was only recently that scholars have accepted the fact that there is a continuum between the lower and higher Hermetica, as representing different stages of initiation. It is a Hermetic belief that the enlightenment of man proceeds according to steps, out of which knowledge of the natural world – including magic, alchemy and astrology – must be gathered in the process.
In the next installment I will attempt to analyze the figure of Hermes Trismegistus and his Egyptian roots in the mysterious figure of the ibis-headed god Thoth.
References:
(1) Festugiere, A.J. (1944-1954). La Révélation d’Hermes Trismegiste, 4 vols.
(2) Yates, F. Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition.
(3) Fowden, G. (1986). The Egyptian Hermes. A Historical Approach to the Late Pagan Mind.
Kingsley, P. (1993). ‘Poimandres:the Etymology of the Name and the Origin of the Hermetica’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 56, pp.1-24.
Mahe, J.P. (1998). “A
Mahe, J.P. (1978-1982). Hermes en Haute-Egypte, 2 vols,
The best updated English-language translations of the Corpus Hermeticum are either B. Copenhaver’s Hermetica and the recent (1999) translation of the Corpus Hermeticum, called The Way of Hermes:
Copenhaver, B. (1992). Hermetica.
The Way of Hermes: The Corpus Hermeticum, trans. by Clement Salaman, Dorine van Oyen and William D. Wharton, The Definitions of Hermes Trismegistus to Asclepius, trans. by Jean-Pierre Mahé. (1999).
More Reading:
| Any reader interested in the Hermetic writings should read one of the two main translations of Copenhaver or The Way of Hermes. If possible, read both and compare them, you will find some interesting differences. | The Way of Hermes: |
Copenhaver’s Hermetica |
| It is unfortunate that the seminal works of J.P. Mahe (Hermes au Haute-Egypte) and the classical Festugiere are not found in proper English translation. Actually, they are hard to find at all! However, the important argument of G. Fowden, The Egyptian Hermes, can luckily be found in (online) stores. So is the groundbreaking Yates’ book, Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition, which is slightly outdated but still a must for anyone interested in the Hermetic field. | Fowden’s Egyptian Hermes | Yates’ Giordano Bruno |
Tags: Ancient Egypt, Corpus Hermeticum, hermes trismegistus, hermetic, Hermeticism, moses, mystery, pharao, renaissance, thoth
February 8th, 2010 at 8:12 pm
I have been a reader for a long while, but am a first time commenter. I just wanted to let you know that this has been / is my favorite entry of yours! Keep up the great work and I’ll keep on checking back.
February 10th, 2010 at 12:04 pm
Thanks for talking about this topic. I had been looking for good information about it.
March 4th, 2010 at 2:31 pm
Finally, an issue that I am passionate about. I have looked for information of this topic for the last several hours. Your site is greatly valued.